kriadydragon (
kriadydragon) wrote2011-09-17 06:34 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Writing Discussion 2
Including descriptions of characters' actions in dialogue scenes - how much is too much, and how much is not enough? You don't want it to just be a long string of "he said/she said", but you don't want to describe every eyebrow twitch, either ...
no subject
The chief importance of dialogue markers, I think, is to provide pauses and to make sure the reader does not lose track of who is saying what. So although you don't need to mark every sentence, it is seldom appropriate to leave an entire conversation unmarked.
There are also times when facial (or other) expression can take the place of a line of dialogue entirely, and if it is appropriate to a character it can add variety to the exchange. A raised eyebrow, for instance, can mean "I don't believe you" without any support from spoken words, prompting the other character to babble on "no really, it's true, it looked like an enormous slime mold, and it won't let us cross its bridge until we bring it an immersion blender!" But it should generally be used sparingly, except for a character well known for his or her lack of verbal expression. Oz from Buffy fandom, for instance, is famously not much of a talker.
no subject
The stories I've read that I felt had the best execution of dialog were those stories that did a little of everything. This includes lines of dialog with no dialog markers. ("What did you say?" "I said." Or "What did you say?" He turned to face his accuser...).